Score 5.0
Government of Chile
| Not set | 
100% ( 50 / 50 ) |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | (...) |
|---|
Images without alt |
7% ( 63 / 925 ) |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | (...) |
|---|---|---|
Images with null alt |
3% ( 24 / 925 ) |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | (...) |
| No validation errors | 
0% ( 0 / 35 ) |
|
|---|---|---|
| With validation errors |
100% ( 35 / 35 ) |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | (...) |
| Average errors per page | 7 (248/35) | |
| Pending validation |
30% ( 15 / 50 ) |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | (...) |
| No validation errors |
100% ( 33 / 33 ) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pending validation |
30% ( 15 / 50 ) |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | (...) |
About Web Accessibility FrameWork (demo version)
The page list of each site under observation in Web Accessibility FrameWork
Just as with the website list, page lists are also classified according to their score. By simply observing the list, it is possible to realize which pages have a greater number of accessibility problems (lowest score), and which respond better to the automatic evaluation (highest score). Therefore, an editor or web designer -or even a team of web designers or editors- can run through the entire list of pages systematically and eliminate the accessibility barriers described in the detailed reports.
The list also indicates the number of evaluations made up to the present time, the date of the final evaluation and whether the current score is equal to, higher or lower than the one obtained before.
The tab "Statistics" is made up of a data board that summarizes what was observed in all the pages of the site that are recorded in Web Accessibility FrameWork. It is, essentially, an overview of the sample collected from the entire website. This overview is particularly useful for the human evaluation, which is an important part of any reliable verification of the WCAG 2.0. On the one hand, there are some W3C accessibility guidelines that make sense only when a set of pages -instead of a single page- are considered; on the other hand, a critical approach of some strategies for content design is easier when a large number of cases are observed. An example of the former case is the recommendation that each page should have a unique and unrepeatable title. An example of the latter is the use of an alt="" (null) for decorative images. Even though this practice is acceptable, it would be strange and questionable if, hypothetically, 100% of the images in a site had an empty text alternative.
This demo does not include examples of data resulting from the evaluation by experts. However, Web Accessibility FrameWork will include a module consisting of the pages and the analyses that result from manual evaluations carried out by accessibility experts. The system will contain self-regulatory mechanisms capable of detecting the changes in the manually evaluated pages and determining whether it is necessary to request further manual evaluations over time.